[ad_1]
The third-generation M3 machines were introduced for the first time in 2013 and since then, they had been gradually used, in phases, for different elections, the ECI said. File photograph
The Election Commission of India (ECI) on Friday, April, 5, 2024, vehemently opposed a writ petition filed by the DMK questioning the design of third-generation M3 Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) in which the Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) printers are sandwiched between the balloting units and control units without a direction connection between the two units.
Appearing before the first Division Bench of Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala and Justice J. Sathya Narayana Prasad, ECI counsel Niranjan Rajagopalan said, such writ petitions filed by political parties time and again end up creating absolutely unnecessary apprehension in the minds of the voters. “It will send a wrong message. People will start doubting the EVMs,” he told the Bench.
He said EVMs were being used for elections in the country since the early 1980s and no one who had approached the courts so far had been able to prove the possibility of tampering with those machines. “Raising questions over the use of the machines during every other election amounts to flogging a dead horse. It does not serve any better purpose,” the counsel said.
Mr. Rajagopalan said, the third-generation M3 machines against which the present writ petition had been filed were introduced for the first time in 2013 and since then, they had been gradually used, in phases, for different elections. “These M3 machines were used extensively in the 2021 Tamil Nadu Assembly elections in which the petitioner party (DMK) had won,” he told the court.
When the Chief Justice wanted to know why the DMK had approached the court at the eleventh hour, senior counsel N.R. Elango said, the issues raised in the writ petition came to the notice of the party only in January this year. Therefore, it had made a representation in this regard to the Chief Election Commissioner during his recent visit to Tamil Nadu and then filed the case due to inaction.
The senior counsel also made it clear the petitioner party does not seek any relief for the 2024 Lok Sabha polls and that all issues raised by it in the writ petition were being pressed only for future elections. After recording his submission, the judges adjourned further hearing on the writ petition to June 20 after observing that there was no pressing urgency to hear the matter immediately.
Apart from questioning the design of the M3 EVMs, the party had sought a direction to the ECI to lay down procedures for approval of the EVMs. It also insisted upon issuing a direction to the ECI to formulate the guidelines to be followed by Returning Officers while dealing with applications made by election agents to count the paper slips collected as part of the VVPAT system.
[ad_2]
Source link
